Journal
INTERNATIONAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES-RIMCIS
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages 107-128Publisher
HIPATIA PRESS
DOI: 10.17583/rimcis.2020.5386
Keywords
false information; evidence-based science information; social impact; social media; COVID-19
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Since the Coronavirus health emergency was declared, many are the fake news that have circulated around this topic, including rumors, conspiracy theories and myths. According to the World Economic Forum, fake news is one of the threats in today's societies, since this type of information circulates fast and is often inaccurate and misleading. Moreover, fake-news are far more shared than evidence-based news among social media users and thus, this can potentially lead to decisions that do not consider the individual's best interest. Drawing from this evidence, the present study aims at comparing the type of tweets and Sina Weibo posts regarding COVID-19 that contain either false or scientific veracious information from February 6 and 7 of 2020. To that end 1923 messages from each social media were retrieved, classified and compared. Results from this analysis show that there is more false news published and shared on Twitter than in Sina Weibo, at the same time science-based evidence is more shared on Twitter than in Weibo but less than false news. This stresses the need to find effective practices to limit the circulation of false information.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available