4.7 Article

Genetic algorithms for skull-face overlay including mandible articulation

Journal

INFORMATION SCIENCES
Volume 420, Issue -, Pages 200-217

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2017.08.029

Keywords

Forensic identification; Craniofacial superimposition; Skull-face overlay; Mandible articulation; Image registration; Genetic algorithms

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad under the NEWSOCO project [TIN2015-67661-P]
  2. Andalusian Consejeria de Innovacion, Ciencia y Empresa [TIC2011-7745]
  3. Spanish MECD FPU grant [AP-2012-4285]
  4. Spanish MINECO Juan de la Cierva Fellowship [JCI-2012-15359]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Craniofacial superimposition (CFS) is a skeleton-based technique that aims to provide identity to a skull through its superimposition with one or more photographs of candidate missing people. While traditionally performed by forensic experts, computer-aided CFS methods can now provide substantial speedups and are quickly progressing towards a large degree of automation. A current major limitation concerns the position of the mandible, which is required to be manually set by the expert beforehand in order to reproduce the facial expression of the subject in each available photograph. This is time-consuming and prone to errors. In this work, we address this issue by extending the state-of-the-art genetic algorithm-based method with the ability to allocate the mandible in the right position according to an anatomical model. Based on a dataset of simulated ante-mortem images with different mandible apertures and facial poses, we prove experimentally that the proposed method is able to effectively tackle cases displaying a much larger range of mandible positions. In fact, thanks to the new genetic design, it is able to outperform the original method, even when the mandible aperture is very small. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available