4.6 Article

Automated System for Chromosome Karyotyping to Recognize the Most Common Numerical Abnormalities Using Deep Learning

Journal

IEEE ACCESS
Volume 8, Issue -, Pages 157727-157747

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3019937

Keywords

Biological cells; Feature extraction; Machine learning; Image segmentation; Training; Indexes; Computational modeling; Convolutional neural network; deep learning; chromosomes classification; data augmentation; transfer learning; object detection

Funding

  1. Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR), King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah [DG-21-611-1441]
  2. DSR

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chromosome analysis is an essential task in a cytogenetics lab, where cytogeneticists can diagnose whether there are abnormalities or not. Karyotyping is a standard technique in chromosome analysis that classifies metaphase image to 24 chromosome classes. The main two categories of chromosome abnormalities are structural abnormalities that are changing in the structure of chromosomes and numerical abnormalities which include either monosomy (missing one chromosome) or trisomy (extra copy of the chromosome). Manual karyotyping is complex and requires high domain expertise, as it takes an amount of time. With these motivations, in this research, we used deep learning to automate karyotyping to recognize the common numerical abnormalities on a dataset containing 147 non-overlapped metaphase images collected from the Center of Excellence in Genomic Medicine Research at King Abdulaziz University. The metaphase images went through three stages. The first one is individual chromosomes detection using YOLOv2 Convolutional Neural Network followed by some chromosome post-processing. This step achieved 0.84 mean IoU, 0.9923 AP, and 100% individual chromosomes detection accuracy. The second stage is feature extraction and classification where we fine-tune VGG19 network using two different approaches, one by adding extra fully connected layer(s) and another by replacing fully connected layers with the global average pooling layer. The best accuracy obtained is 95.04%. The final step is detecting abnormality and this step obtained 96.67% abnormality detection accuracy. To further validate the proposed classification method, we examined the Biomedical Imaging Laboratory dataset which is publicly available online and achieved 94.11% accuracy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available