4.7 Article

The Origin of Massive Stars: The Inertial-inflow Model

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 900, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/abaa47

Keywords

Interstellar medium; Protostars; Interstellar dynamics; Magnetohydrodynamics; Star formation

Funding

  1. Spanish MINECO [AYA2017-88754-P]
  2. Danish Council for Independent Research (DFF) [1323-00199B]
  3. Centre for Star and Planet Formation - Danish National Research Foundation [DNRF97]
  4. NSFC [11973098]
  5. Academy of Finland [285769]
  6. Barcelona Supercomputing Center [AECT-2018-3-0019]
  7. Villum Fonden [VKR023406]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We address the problem of the origin of massive stars, namely the origin, path, and timescale of the mass flows that create them. Based on extensive numerical simulations, we propose a scenario where massive stars are assembled by large-scale, converging, inertial flows that naturally occur in supersonic turbulence. We refer to this scenario of massive-star formation as the inertial-inflow model. This model stems directly from the idea that the mass distribution of stars is primarily the result of turbulent fragmentation. Under this hypothesis, the statistical properties of turbulence determine the formation timescale and mass of prestellar cores, posing definite constraints on the formation mechanism of massive stars. We quantify such constraints by analyzing a simulation of supernova-driven turbulence in a 250 pc region of the interstellar medium, describing the formation of hundreds of massive stars over a time of approximately 30 Myr. Due to the large size of our statistical sample, we can say with full confidence that massive stars in general do not form from the collapse of massive cores nor from competitive accretion, as both models are incompatible with the numerical results. We also compute synthetic continuum observables in the Herschel and ALMA bands. We find that, depending on the distance of the observed regions, estimates of core mass based on commonly used methods may exceed the actual core masses by up to two orders of magnitude and that there is essentially no correlation between estimated and real core masses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available