4.7 Article

Selective pressures of heavy metals on microbial community determine microbial functional roles during composting: Sensitive, resistant and actor

Journal

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Volume 398, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122858

Keywords

Heavy metals; Composting; Selective pressures; Microbial functional roles

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51778116, 51878132]
  2. National Key Research and Development Project [2019YFC1906400]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Heavy metals (HM) pollution exerts an effect on microbial community composition and structure during composting, the way how microbial community responses to HM pressure is remain poorly understood though. The aim of this study was to explore functional roles of microorganisms based on selective pressures of HM (Cu, Zn and Cd). The results of microbial resistance showed that the toxicity of metals to microorganisms were Cu > Zn > Cd during composting. Cu and Zn were more toxic for microorganisms during composting when compared with Cd. However, microorganisms had a longer lag period to grow under Zn stress through microbial tolerance determination. In addition, the microbial catalase activity generally decreased and protease activity generally increased, thus microorganisms became more adaptable to HM stress during composting. The experimental results confirmed the existence of sensitive, resistant and actor microorganisms during beef cattle and chicken manures composting. Ultimately, the resistant, sensitive and actor microorganisms at genus level were distinguished under HM pressure based on the network analysis and structural equation models, including 85 resistant microorganisms, 5 sensitive microorganisms and 6 actor microorganisms. This would be helpful to understand the microbial succession process under HM stress and identify functional strains of HM remediation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available