4.5 Article

Association Between Lipid Accumulation Product and Mild Cognitive Impairment in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE
Volume 77, Issue 1, Pages 367-374

Publisher

IOS PRESS
DOI: 10.3233/JAD-200332

Keywords

Lipid accumulation product; mild cognitive impairment; type 2 diabetes; visceral obesity

Categories

Funding

  1. Natural Foundation of Heilongjiang Province [H2015057]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Diabetes may increase the risk of conversion of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to dementia. Lipid accumulation product (LAP), an index of visceral obesity, has been shown to be a powerful predictor of insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes (T2D). However, little attention has been paid to the relationship between LAP and MCI in T2D. Objective: We aimed to investigate the association between the LAP index and MCI in patients with T2D. Methods: In total, 220 hospitalized patients with T2D, including 113 MCI patients and 107 patients with normal cognition, were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. We collected demographic, anthropometric, and biochemical data on each subject. The LAP index was calculated according to the following formulas: [waist circumference (WC) (cm) - 65] x triglyceride (TG) (mmol/L) for males and [WC (cm) - 58] x TG (mmol/L) for females. Results: Compared with patients with normal cognition, MCI patients were older and had a higher LAP index, WC, body mass index, and glycosylated hemoglobin A1c level, as well as a lower Montreal Cognitive Assessment score and education level (p < 0.05). After adjusting for confounding factors, LAP index was associated with MCI (OR =1.047, 95% CI = 1.031-1.063, p < 0.01). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for the LAP index was higher than that for WC and BMI. Conclusion: A high LAP index is associated with an increased risk of MCI in T2D patients. The LAP index appears to be a good indicator of risk of MCI in patients with T2D.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available