3.8 Article

Robust Edge Detection Method for the Segmentation of Diabetic Foot Ulcer Images

Journal

ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY & APPLIED SCIENCE RESEARCH
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages 6034-6040

Publisher

EOS ASSOC

Keywords

edge detection; execution time; diabetic foot ulcers; MSSIM; PSNR; image segmentation

Funding

  1. African Development Bank (AfDB), United Republic of Tanzania [P-Z1-IA0-016, 2100155032816]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Segmentation is an open-ended research problem in various computer vision and image processing tasks. This pre-processing operation requires a robust edge detector to generate appealing results. However, the available approaches for edge detection underperform when applied to images corrupted by noise or impacted by poor imaging conditions. The problem becomes significant for images containing diabetic foot ulcers, which originate from people with varied skin color. Comparative performance evaluation of the edge detectors facilitates the process of deciding an appropriate method for image segmentation of diabetic foot ulcers. Our research discovered that the classical edge detectors cannot clearly locate ulcers in images with black-skin feet. In addition, these methods collapse for degraded input images. Therefore, the current research proposes a robust edge detector that can address some limitations of the previous attempts. The proposed method incorporates a hybrid diffusion-steered functional derived from the total variation and the Perona-Malik diffusivities, which have been reported to can effectively capture semantic features in images. The empirical results show that our method generates clearer and stronger edge maps with higher perceptual and objective qualities. More importantly, the proposed method offers lower computational times-an advantage that gives more insights into the possible application of the method in time-sensitive tasks.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available