4.8 Article

Activation of Dorsal Raphe Serotonergic Neurons Promotes Waiting but Is Not Reinforcing

Journal

CURRENT BIOLOGY
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages 306-315

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.12.002

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/52446/2013, SFRH/BPD/46314/2008]
  2. European Research Council [250334]
  3. Champalimaud Foundation
  4. European Research Council (ERC) [250334] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)
  5. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BPD/46314/2008] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The central neuromodulator serotonin (5-HT) has been implicated in a wide range of behaviors and affective disorders, but the principles underlying its function remain elusive. One influential line of research has implicated 5-HT in response inhibition and impulse control. Another has suggested a role in affective processing. However, whether and how these effects relate to each other is still unclear. Results: Here, we report that optogenetic activation of 5-HT neurons in the dorsal raphe nucleus (DRN) produces a dose-dependent increase in mice's ability to withhold premature responding in a task that requires them to wait several seconds for a randomly delayed tone. The 5-HT effect had a rapid onset and was maintained throughout the stimulation period. In addition, movement speed was slowed, but photostimulation did not affect reaction time or time spent at the reward port. Using similar photostimulation protocols in place preference and value-based choice tests, we found no evidence of either appetitive or aversive effects of DRN 5-HT neuron activation. Conclusions: These results provide strong evidence that the efficacy of DRN 5-HT neurons in promoting waiting for delayed reward is independent of appetitive or aversive effects and support the importance of 5-HT in behavioral persistence and impulse control.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available