4.2 Article

Friction and wear behavior of hydrogenated diamond-like carbon coating against titanium alloys under large normal load and variable velocity

Journal

INDUSTRIAL LUBRICATION AND TRIBOLOGY
Volume 69, Issue 2, Pages 199-207

Publisher

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/ILT-08-2016-0188

Keywords

Titanium alloy; Friction; Wear; H-DLC; Large load; Variable velocity

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51575340, 51575342]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose - This paper aims to investigate the effects of reciprocating frequency, large normal load on friction and wear behavior of hydrogenated diamond-like carbon (H-DLC) coating against Ti-6Al-4V ball under dry and lubricated conditions. Design/methodology/approach - The friction and wear mechanisms are analyzed by scanning electron microscope, energy dispersive spectroscopy and Raman spectroscopy. Findings - The results show that as reciprocating frequency increases under lubricated conditions, the friction coefficient decreases first and then increases. When the reciprocating frequency is 2.54 Hz, the value of friction coefficient reaches the minimum. The friction reduction is because of the transformation from sp(3) to sp(2), the formation of transfer layer on Ti-6Al-4V ball and the reduction in viscous friction, whereas the increase of friction coefficient is related to wear. In dry conditions, the friction coefficient is between 0.06 and 0.1. And, the service life of H-DLC coating decreases with the increase in reciprocating frequency and normal load. Research limitations/implications - It is confirmed that adding the lubricant could prolong the service life of H-DLC coating and reduce friction and wear efficiently. And, the wear mechanisms under dry and lubricated conditions encompass abrasive wear and adhesive wear. Originality/value - The results are helpful for application of diamond-like carbon coating.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available