4.7 Article

Microwave-assisted extraction of polysaccharides from Moringa oleifera Lam. leaves: Characterization and hypoglycemic activity

Journal

INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS
Volume 100, Issue -, Pages 1-11

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.01.042

Keywords

Polysaccharides; Microwave-assisted extraction; Functional properties

Funding

  1. Guangdong Science and Technology Program [2014B090904063]
  2. Guangdong Province

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Microwave -assisted extraction of Moringa oleifera Lam. leaf polysaccharides was investigated using a response surface methodology. The following conditions were found to generate an experimental yield of 2.96 +/- 0.11%, which closely agreed with the predicted value of 2.89%: time 70 min, microwave power 700W, temperature 70 degrees C and a liquid/solid ratio of 35 mL/g. After the MLPs were treated with graded precipitation of 40%, 60% and 80% (v/v) ethanol solution, the respective average rholecular weight polysaccharide fractions, namely MLP-1 (9.68 x 10(3) kDa), MLP-2 (6.29 x 10(3) kDa) and MLP-3 (4.86 x 10(3) kDa), were obtained. These three fractions were composed of xylose, mannose, glucose, galactose and arabinose but with differing molar ratios. They had similar Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy but their surface morphology differed as determined by scanning electron microscdpy. The Congo red assay indicated that the three fractions were not helical polysaccharides. The three polysaccharide fractions exhibited different rheological properties. MLP-1 exhibited pseudoplastic flow behaviors, while MLP-3 displayed near -Newtonian flow behaviors over the entire accessible frequency range. In addition, MLP-had stronger inhibitory effects on a -amylase and a-glucosidase than MLP-1 and MLP-2. The results suggest that MLP-3 has potential for the treatment of diabetes. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available