4.7 Article

Morphological and biochemical intraspecific characterization of Ocimum basilicum L.

Journal

INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS
Volume 109, Issue -, Pages 611-618

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.09.018

Keywords

Ocimum basilicum L.; Lamiaceae; Basil; Essential oil composition; Chemotaxonomy; GC

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science, Education and Sports of the Republic of Croatia [178-1191193-0212]
  2. Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia [173021]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ocimum basilicum L. exhibits a great variety of cultivars grown for various purposes. The aim of this research was to analyse the chemical composition of 85 O. basilicum accessions cultivated throughout the world using gas chromatography (GC/FID and GC/MS). All accessions were previously categorized into six morphotypes based on 24 morphological traits: True basil, Small-leaf, Lettuce-leaf, Purple basil A, Purple basil B and Purple basil C morphotype. A total of 77 volatiles were observed, with seven of them being in concentrations higher than 10% in at least one accession (1,8-cineole, linalool, linalool acetate, methyl chavicol, eugenol, trans-methyl cinnamate, trans-a-bergamotene). Based on the essential oil composition of 85 O. basilicum accessions, we propose the intraspecific characterization of O. basilicum into five chemotypes: (A) High-linalool, (B) Linalool/trans-alpha-bergamotene, (C) Linalool/methyl chavicol, (D) Linalool/trans-methyl cinnamate and (E) High-methyl chavicol chemotype. Groups based on morphological and biochemical traits do not necessarily coincide with one another. Due to great morphological and biochemical diversity, both morphological and chemical characterizations are crucial for the effective management of germplasm collections to facilitate the use of the accessions in future breeding programs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available