4.7 Article

Design and optimization of alkaline binders of limestone-metakaolin- A comparison of strength, microstructure and sustainability with portland cement and geopolymers

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
Volume 273, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123118

Keywords

Limestone; Metakaolin; Alkaline binders; Geopolymers; Statistical optimization; Environmental impact; Sustainable cements

Funding

  1. Project 154 Fund SEP-Cinvestav 2018
  2. Mexican National Council of Science and Technology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Studies on alkali activated cements (AAC) of metakaolin (MK) with up to 50% replacement by limestone (LS) have recently emerged; although interesting, no reduction in the alkali content has generally been implemented, in detriment of the durability, safety, environmental impact and costs. This paper presents an innovative approach for designing sustainable AAC of composites precursors of MK with high contents of LS, activated by NaOH-Na2O center dot nSiO(2). The method combines design of mixtures and a multi-response statistical optimization, in which the 28-day strength was maximized while the CO2-emissions, energy demand and production cost were simultaneously minimized. The approach resulted in a binder with high LS and reduced MK and alkali contents. The optimal formulation was 80%LS, Na2O/Al2O3 = 0.94, and SiO2/Al2O3 = 3.54, equivalent to only 4.7% Na2O relative to the mass of the precursors (MK + LS), which reduces the risk of deleterious carbonation and is lower than the requirements of AAC of 100%MK and similar to those of AAC of blast furnace slag. This optimal binder had predicted and measured strengths of 49.96 +/- 13.1 and 51.9 +/- 0.7 MPa, respectively, which confirmed the accuracy of the modelling; its microstructure had a dense matrix of cementitious products with partially reacted limestone particles distributed throughout, the reaction products were amorphous with a chemical composition that suggested a mixture of (C,N) A-S-H with N-A-S-H, CASH and C-S-H. Compared to a reference portland cement, the optimal formulation emits 75.1% less CO2, consumes 41.1% less energy and is 42.6% less expensive; while compared to the AAC of 100%MK, the reductions were 51.6, 53.8 and 57.5%, respectively. The optimal formulation represents a competitive sustainable alternative cement. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available