4.6 Article

Advances and challenges for experiment and theory for multi-electron multi-proton transfer at electrified solid-liquid interfaces

Journal

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 22, Issue 35, Pages 19401-19442

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0cp02741c

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institute for Materials Science for fundamental science
  2. JSPS KAKENHI [19K15527, 19H05460]
  3. TIA collaborative research program [Kakehashi] Program [TK19-002, TK20-11]
  4. Academy of Finland [307853]
  5. Center for Alkaline-Based Energy Solutions, an Energy Frontier Research Center - U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences
  6. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [19K15527, 19H05460] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Multi-electron, multi-proton transfer is important in a wide spectrum of processes spanning biological, chemical and physical systems. These reactions have attracted significant interest due to both fundamental curiosity and potential applications in energy technology. In this Perspective Review, we shed light on modern aspects of electrode processes in the 21st century, in particular on the recent advances and challenges in multistep electron/proton transfers at solid-liquid interfaces. Ongoing developments of analytical techniques and operando spectrometry at electrode/electrolyte interfaces and reliable computational approaches to simulate complicated interfacial electrochemical reactions enable us to obtain microscopic insights about these complex processes, such as the role of quantum effects in electrochemical reactions. Our motivation in this Perspective Review is to provide a comprehensive survey and discussion of state-of-the-art developments in experiments, materials, and theories for modern electrode process science, as well as to present an outlook for the future directions in this field.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available