4.6 Article

Use of Carbon Steel for Construction of Post-combustion CO2 Capture Facilities: A Pilot-Scale Corrosion Study

Journal

INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH
Volume 56, Issue 16, Pages 4792-4803

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.7b00697

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Department of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) [DE-FE0007395]
  2. Louisville Gas & Electric (LG&E) and Kentucky Utilities (KU)
  3. Duke Energy
  4. Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI)
  5. Kentucky Power
  6. Kentucky Department of Energy Development and Independence (KY-DEDI)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Corrosion studies were carried out on metal coated and noncoated carbon steel as well as stainless steel in a pilot-scale post-combustion CO2 capture process. Aqueous 30 wt % monoethanolamine (MEA) solvent was used without any chemical additive for antioxidation to examine a worst-case scenario where corrosion is not mitigated. The corrosion rate of all carbon steels was almost zero in the absorber column and CO2 lean amine piping except for Ni-coated carbon steel (<1.8 mm/yr). Ni2Al3/Al2O3 precoated carbon steels showed initial protection but lost their integrity in the stripping column and CO2 rich amine piping, and severe corrosion was eventually observed for all carbon steels at these two locations. Stainless steel was found to be stable and corrosion resistant in all of the sampling locations throughout the experiment. This study provides an initial framework for the use of carbon steel as a potential construction material for process units with relatively mild operating conditions (temperature less than 80 degrees C), such as the absorber and CO2 lean amine piping of a post-combustion CO2 capture process. It also warrants further investigation of using carbon steel with more effective corrosion mitigation strategies for process units where harsh environments are expected (such as temperatures greater than 100 degrees C).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available