4.7 Article

Enhancing anti-interference ability of molecularly imprinted ratiometric fluorescence sensor via differential strategy demonstrated by the detection of bovine hemoglobin

Journal

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
Volume 322, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2020.128581

Keywords

Molecular imprinting; Ratiometric fluorescence; Differential measurement; Smartphone; Bovine hemoglobin

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21874083, 21976209, 21804010]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province of China [ZR2018MB029]
  3. Taishan Scholar Project Special Fund [ts20190962]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The non-specific adsorption of interferents onto the outside surface of molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs) particles is disadvantageous for selective determination of the template molecules. Based on the fact that the responses of non-imprinted polymers (NIPs) and MIPs particles to non-template molecules are similar, the anti-interference ability of MIPs sensor can be much improved via differential strategy, demonstrated by bovine hemoglobin (BHb) determination. The MIPs for BHb were prepared via surface imprinting and sol-gel process, with graphene quantum dots@SiO2/CdTe quantum dots (GODs@SiO2/CdTe QDs) for ratiometric fluorescence measurements. By using a weight factor of 1.283 to compensate the lower specific surface area in NIPs particles, the differential ratiometric fluorescence signals between MIPs and NIPs channels to 2.00 mu M ovalbumin and phycocyanin are equivalent to BHb at the concentration of 0.025 and 0.014 mu M, which are only about 11 % and 5.8 % of the interference level in the normal ratiometric fluorescence method, respectively. The differential ratiometric fluorescence measurement was also performed in a smartphone-based device for field analysis of BHb in urine samples, with the linear range of 0.05-4 mu M and the detection limit of 13 nM.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available