4.7 Review

'Opening up' the governance of water-energy-food nexus: Towards a science-policy-society interface based on hybridity and humility

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 744, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140945

Keywords

Governance processes; Water-energy-food nexus; Nexus approach; Science-policy interface; Science and technology studies; Hybridity

Funding

  1. doctoral study Resilience and sustainability nexus in metropolitan contexts: intersectoral synergies from public policies [2016/25375-5]
  2. Research Internships Abroad (BEPE) project entitled The rationality of water-energy -food nexus: challenges and opportunities for urban governance [2018/12155-2]
  3. project Environmental governance of macrometropolis paulista in face of climate variability [2015/03804-9]
  4. FAPESP [2019/12804-3, 2018/21362-1]
  5. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development [309840/2018-0]
  6. ESRC [ES/R008884/1, ES/L01632X/1, ES/S008241/1, ES/K006371/1, ES/I021620/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The governance of the nexus between water, energy, and food (hereafter, 'the nexus') is permeated by complex interactions of knowledge at a science-policy-society interface. This paper starts from a literature review to find the main narratives that allow us to understand what is at stake in this interface. By thematically synthesising 19 select articles, we reached three layers of knowledge interaction: 'knowledge application', 'knowledge integration', and 'knowledge transformation'. To avoid misleading simplifications, we discussed the constraints on this debate and some pressures for what we consider as 'closing down' knowledge about the nexus. We then developed a conceptual framework based on the 'technologies of humility' proposed by Jasanoff (2003, 2007) to create opportunities to 'open up' the nexus approach. Finally, we illustrated the four pillars proposed by some studies to describe what we have termed 'nexus of humility': framing, vulnerability, distribution, and learning. These foci seek to enable a humbler appreciation on all sides of the persistent sources of uncertainty, divergence, and conditionality in sustainability governance. This framework also contributes towards necessary transformations of knowledge about nexus and its challenging implementation. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available