4.7 Review

Activity and selectivity of CO2 photoreduction on catalytic materials

Journal

DALTON TRANSACTIONS
Volume 49, Issue 37, Pages 12918-12928

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0dt02651d

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Science Challenge Project [TZ2018004]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51572016, U1530401, 11747167, 11804090, 11847213, 51472209, 11774298, 21703081, U1401241, 21503012]
  3. Scientific Research Fund of Hunan provincial Education Department, China [17C0626, 2019JJ50148]
  4. Tianhe-2JK computing time award at the Beijing Computational Science Research Center (CSRC)
  5. Special Program for Applied Research on Super Computation of the NSFC Guangdong Joint Fund (the second phase) [U1501501]
  6. Royal Society Newton Advanced Fellowship scheme [NAF\R1\180242]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Photoreduction of molecular CO2 by solar light into added-value fuels or chemical feedstocks is an appealing strategy to simultaneously overcome environmental problems and energy challenges. However, multiple reaction steps and a large number of possible products have significantly hindered the development of highly selective catalysts capable of delivering CO(2 )conversion with high efficiency. Recently, several strategies associated with different conversion mechanisms have been proposed to improve the activity and product selectivity of CO2 photocatalysts. These are based on development of low dimensional nanomaterials, defect or facet engineering, design of tailored heterostructures, and carrier conductivity enhancement. In spite of impressive progress in the field, real-world applications are yet to be delivered. To sustain further research in this promising field, here we provide a short frontier of recent advances in activity and selectivity of CO2 reduction photocatalysts, together with a critical discussion of further avenues of research in this field.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available