3.8 Proceedings Paper

Towards prediction of the rates of antihydrogen positive ion production in collision of antihydrogen with excited positronium

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1412/5/052012

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [17K05592, 18H05461]
  2. Swedish Research Council (VR)
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [18H05461, 17K05592] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a 4-body calculation of scattering between an antihydrogen atom ((H) over bar) and a positronium (Ps) aiming at the prediction of cross sections for the production of antihydrogen positive ions (($H) over bar (+)). The antihydrogen positive ions are expected to be a useful source of ultra-cold anti-atoms for the test of matter-antimatter gravity. We convert the Schrodinger equation to a set of coupled integro-differential equations that involve intermediate states which facilitate the internal region description of the scattering wavefunction. They are solved using a compact finite difference method. Our framework is extended to scattering between an excited Ps and (H) over bar. Cross sections of the reactions, Ps (1s/2s/3s) + (H) over bar -> e(-) + (H) over bar (+), in s-wave collisions, are calculated. It is found that the reactions originating from Ps (1s/2s) + H produce (H) over bar (+) with a constant cross section within 0.05 eV above the threshold while the reaction cross section from Ps (3s) decreases as the collision energy increases in the same energy interval. Just above the threshold, the cross section of (H) over bar (+) production from Ps (3s) + (H) over bar in s-wave collision is 7.8 times larger than that from Ps (1 s) + (H) over bar in s-wave and 2.3 times larger than that from Ps (2s) + (H) over bar in s-wave. The near-threshold de-excitation reaction from Ps (3s) + (H) over bar occurs more rapidly than the (H) over bar (+) production.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available