4.7 Article

The cross-talk between methylation and phosphorylation in lymphoid-specific helicase drives cancer stem-like properties

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41392-020-00249-w

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81672991, 81874139, 81872285, 81728014, 81672787, 81672307, 81772927]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2015CB553903]
  3. Overseas Expertise Introduction Project for Discipline Innovation (111 Project) [111-2-12]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2017zzts206]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Posttranslational modifications (PTMs) of proteins, including chromatin modifiers, play crucial roles in the dynamic alteration of various protein properties and functions including stem-cell properties. However, the roles of Lymphoid-specific helicase (LSH), a DNA methylation modifier, in modulating stem-like properties in cancer are still not clearly clarified. Therefore, exploring PTMs modulation of LSH activity will be of great significance to further understand the function and activity of LSH. Here, we demonstrate that LSH is capable to undergo PTMs, including methylation and phosphorylation. The arginine methyltransferase PRMT5 can methylate LSH at R309 residue, meanwhile, LSH could as well be phosphorylated by MAPK1 kinase at S503 residue. We further show that the accumulation of phosphorylation of LSH at S503 site exhibits downregulation of LSH methylation at R309 residue, which eventually promoting stem-like properties in lung cancer. Whereas, phosphorylation-deficient LSH S503A mutant promotes the accumulation of LSH methylation at R309 residue and attenuates stem-like properties, indicating the critical roles of LSH PTMs in modulating stem-like properties. Thus, our study highlights the importance of the crosstalk between LSH PTMs in determining its activity and function in lung cancer stem-cell maintenance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available