3.9 Article

Screening of Penaeus vannamei Boone, 1931 collected from east coast of India for monodon baculovirus (MBV) and hepatopancreatic parvovirus (HPV)

Journal

INDIAN JOURNAL OF FISHERIES
Volume 64, Issue -, Pages 235-237

Publisher

CENTRAL MARINE FISHERIES RESEARCH INST
DOI: 10.21077/ijf.2017.64.special-issue.76293-36

Keywords

Hepatopancreatic parvovirus; Monodon baculovirus; Penaeus vannamei; Prevalence

Categories

Funding

  1. NFDB
  2. NSPAAD

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aquaculture is one of the fastest growing sectors yielding more than 10% growth rate per annum over the past 10 years, with a contribution of about 16% of animal protein production globally. Aquaculture production has surpassed that of the other meat producing sectors. Diseases, especially of viral etiology, remains a stumbling block for the growth of this sector posing great threat. The major viruses affecting shrimps in India are white spot syndrome virus (WSSV) and infectious hypodermal hematopoietic necrosis virus (IHHNV). Besides this, monodon baculovirus (MBV) and hepatopancreatic parvovirus (HPV) also cause considerable loss to the shrimp farmers. MBV outbreaks can cause mass mortalities when combined with other viral diseases. Moreover, MBV and HPV infections can lead to slow growth in cultured penaeid shrimps, thereby affecting the production. Although studies pertaining to the prevalence of these two viruses in the tiger shrimp Penaeus monodon have been reported extensively, similar information on Penaeus vannamei farming is scanty. Hence a pilot study was undertaken to screen P. vannamei samples collected from various farms of Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh and West Bengal. Shrimp samples (n=20) from six farms during 35-75 days of culture (DOC) were collected for screening by PCR. It was found that all the samples were negative for MBV and HPV. It could be concluded that the prevalence of both these viruses in P. vannamei are either absent or very low.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available