4.7 Article

A Hard Look at Local, Optically Selected, Obscured Seyfert Galaxies*

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 901, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/abb29f

Keywords

Active galactic nuclei; X-ray active galactic nuclei; Active galaxies; High energy astrophysics; X-ray astronomy; Seyfert galaxies; X-ray surveys

Funding

  1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  2. ESA Member States
  3. NASA
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [NRF-2020R1C1C1005462]
  5. Center of Excellence of the ISF [2752/19]
  6. National Research Council of Science & Technology (NST), Republic of Korea [2020183006] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We study the X-ray spectra of a sample of 19 obscured, optically selected Seyfert galaxies (Sy 1.8, 1.9, and 2) in the local universe (d <= 175 Mpc), drawn from the CfA Seyfert sample. Our analysis is driven by the high sensitivity of NuSTAR in the hard X-rays, coupled with soft X-ray spectra using XMM-Newton, Chandra, Suzaku, and Swift/XRT. We also analyze the optical spectra of these sources in order to obtain accurate mass estimates and Eddington fractions. We employ four different models to analyze the X-ray spectra of these sources, which all provide consistent results. We find that 79%-90% of the sources are heavily obscured with line-of-sight column densityN(H) > 10(23)cm(-2). We also find a Compton-thick (N-H > 10(24)cm(-2)) fraction of 37%-53%. These results are consistent with previous estimates based on multiwavelength analyses. We find that the fraction of reprocessed to intrinsic emission is positively correlated withN(H)and negatively correlated with the intrinsic, unabsorbed X-ray luminosity (in agreement with the Iwasawa-Taniguchi effect). Our results support the hypothesis that radiation pressure regulates the distribution of the circumnuclear material.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available