4.7 Article

Capsule Network for Predicting RNA-Protein Binding Preferences Using Hybrid Feature

Publisher

IEEE COMPUTER SOC
DOI: 10.1109/TCBB.2019.2943465

Keywords

RNA; Proteins; Convolution; Encoding; Genomics; Bioinformatics; Task analysis; One-hot encoding; RNA sequence feature; RNA structure feature; capsule network; RNA-Protein binding preference

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFA0902600]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61861146002, 61520106006, 61732012, 61772370, 61702371, 61932008, 61532008, 61672382, 61772357, 61672203]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2017M611619]
  4. BAGUI Scholar Program
  5. Scientific & Technological Base and Talent Special Program, GuiKe of the Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region of China [AD18126015]
  6. Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Major Project [2018SHZDZX01]
  7. LCNBI
  8. ZJLab

Ask authors/readers for more resources

RNA-Protein binding is involved in many different biological processes. With the progress of technology, more and more data are available for research. Based on these data, many prediction methods have been proposed to predict RNA-Protein binding preference. Some of these methods use only RNA sequence features for prediction, and some methods use multiple features for prediction. But, the performance of these methods is not satisfactory. In this study, we propose an improved capsule network to predict RNA-protein binding preferences, which can use both RNA sequence features and structure features. Experimental results show that our proposed method iCapsule performs better than three baseline methods in this field. We used both RNA sequence features and structure features in the model, so we tested the effect of primary capsule layer changes on model performance. In addition, we also studied the impact of model structure on model performance by performing our proposed method with different number of convolution layers and different kernel sizes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available