4.7 Article

Ratiometric fluorescent biosensor for microRNAs imaging in living cells

Journal

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
Volume 322, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2020.128632

Keywords

Graphitic carbon nitride; microRNAs; Fluorescence imaging; Ratiometric biosensor; Nanoprobe

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21874023]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFC1600500]
  3. Program for Chang Jiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University of Ministry of Education of China [IRT15R11]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two-dimensional nanomaterials have been widely used as fluorescent quenching platforms and nanocarriers of fluorophore-labelled nucleic acid probes to design nanoprobes for fluorescence imaging of intracellular microRNAs (miRNAs). However, the detection result was simply dependent on single fluorescent signal of fluorophore-labelled nucleic acid probes. Herein, a ratiometric fluorescent biosensor was proposed by utilizing protonated phenyl-doped carbon nitride (PDCN) nanosheets not only as a fluorescent quenching platform and nanocarrier of ROX-ssDNA probes but also as an internal fluorescent reference. After specific recognition and hybridization of target miRNAs, the fluorescence of ROX-ssDNA probes was recovered while the fluorescence of protonated PDCN nanosheets remained unchanged. By using the fluorescence ratio of ROX-ssDNA probes and protonated PDCN nanosheets as the response signal, this biosensor was used to detect DNA analog of miRNA-224 over a linear range of 1- 50 nmol L-1 with a limit of detection 0.2 nmol L-1. Finally, this ratiometric fluorescent biosensor was applied for fluorescence imaging of miRNA-224 in HeLa cells and HepG2 cells, which indicated this biosensor possessed a great potential for quantitative detection of miRNAs by fluorescence imaging in living cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available