4.6 Article

Effect of fluorination and Li-excess on the Li migration barrier in Mn-based cathode materials

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
Volume 8, Issue 38, Pages 19965-19974

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0ta06415g

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Vehicle Technologies Office, under the Applied Battery Materials Program, of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  2. Department of Energy's Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy
  3. National Science Foundation [ACI1053575]
  4. National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center (NERSC), a DOE Office of Science User Facility - Office of Science
  5. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  6. NSF Graduate Research Fellowship Program (GRFP) [DGE 1752814, DGE 1106400]
  7. U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory [DE-AC52-07NA27344]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Disordered rocksalt (DRX) Li-rich transition metal (TM) oxides, especially those based on Mn, are prospective high-energy-density cathode materials for the next generation of Li-ion batteries that use earth abundant metals. Fluorine substitution on the oxygen sublattice has been shown to reduce oxygen redox by lowering the average anion valence and increasing the amount of redox-active TM, and simultaneously improve energy density, average voltage and capacity retention. While these benefits of fluorination are well established, it is not well understood how F affects Li transport and therefore the rate performance of Mn-based DRX cathodes. Herein, we investigate the effects of both F substitution and the accompanying Li-excess on Li migration barriers using first-principles calculations. We demonstrate that F has a small negative effect on Li migration barriers while Li-excess decreases Li migration barriers. Because fluorination enables more Li-excess, these results do not predict any detrimental impact on Li transport.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available