3.8 Article

Gene Expression Profiling in Uveal Melanoma: Five-Year Prospective Outcomes and Meta-Analysis

Journal

OCULAR ONCOLOGY AND PATHOLOGY
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages 360-367

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000508382

Keywords

Gene expression profiling; Uveal melanoma; Prognosis; Meta-analysis

Categories

Funding

  1. Castle Biosciences, Inc.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction:The prognostic 15-gene expression profile (15-GEP) test for uveal melanoma (UM) predicts metastatic risk based on primary tumor biology. Here we report outcomes from a prospective registry of 15-GEP-tested patients, and a meta-analysis with published cohorts.Objectives:Management and 5-year clinical outcomes following 15-GEP testing were evaluated.Methods:Eighty-nine patients with 15-GEP results were prospectively enrolled at four centers. Physician-recommended management plans were collected, and clinical outcomes tracked every 6 months.Results:Eighty percent of Class 1 (low-risk) patients underwent low-intensity management; all Class 2 (high-risk) patients underwent high-intensity management (p< 0.0001). Median follow-up for event-free patients was 4.9 years. Five Class 1 (10%) and 23 Class 2 (58%) tumors metastasized (p< 0.0001). Five-year Class 1 and 2 metastasis-free survival rates were 90% (81-100%) and 41% (27-62%;p< 0.0001), and melanoma-specific survival rates were 94% (87-100%) and 63% (49-82%;p= 0.0007). Class 2 was the only independent predictor of metastasis and was associated with increased risk for metastasis and mortality by meta-analysis.Conclusions:UM patient management is guided by 15-GEP testing. Class 2 patients were managed more intensely, in accordance with an observed metastatic rate of >50%; Class 1 patients were safely spared intensive surveillance, resulting in appropriate utilization of healthcare resources.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available