4.6 Article

Na2Fe2OS2, a new earth abundant oxysulphide cathode material for Na-ion batteries

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
Volume 8, Issue 39, Pages 20553-20569

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0ta07966a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. EPSRC [EP/N004884]
  2. UCL [PR16195]
  3. Royal Society
  4. EPSRC [EP/N004884/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Multiple anion materials are of particular interest for the discovery of new crystal structures and offer an original way to modulate physical properties, including energy storage materials with enhanced performances. Through careful synthesis optimization, a new Na(2)Fe(2)OS(2)phase was prepared by two different routes: high temperature solid-state synthesis and simple mechanochemical synthesis. The long-range and local structure of Na(2)Fe(2)OS(2)was studied by Rietveld refinement of neutron and X-ray diffraction data combined with EXAFS data refinement. The phase comprises an amorphous and a crystalline part which has an anti-K(2)NiF(4)structure, corresponding to then= 1 member of the homologous anti-Ruddlesden-Popper [AX][ABX(3)](n)series. Its electrochemical properties as a cathode material were studied in Na half cells and Na-ion full cells, revealing that the material becomes fully amorphous upon initial desodiation to Na0.5Fe2OS2, but maintains a reversible capacity of 135 mA h g(-1)in full cells where up to 1.2 Na(+)can be reversibly extracted and reinserted when compensating for the Na lost in SEI formation. The stability of the pristine material and its structural evolution upon charging are discussed, paving the way for further optimization of this material. Being composed exclusively of earth-abundant elements and stable under dry air, Na(2)Fe(2)OS(2)perfectly illustrates the great opportunity of multiple anion chemistry to explore new structure types and develop better energy storage systems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available