4.4 Article

Quantitative T2 mapping using accelerated 3D stack-of-spiral gradient echo readout

Journal

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
Volume 73, Issue -, Pages 138-147

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2020.08.007

Keywords

T-2 mapping; 3D stack-of-spiral; Model-based reconstruction; Compressed sensing; Cerebrospinal fluid nulling; 2-parameter-weighted fitting

Funding

  1. NIH [R01 HL138182, R01 HL144751, R01 HL135500, S10 OD021648]
  2. American Society of Hematology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To develop a rapid T-2 mapping protocol using optimized spiral acquisition, accelerated reconstruction, and model fitting. Materials and methods: A T-2-prepared stack-of-spiral gradient echo (GRE) pulse sequence was applied. A model-based approach joined with compressed sensing was compared with the two methods applied separately for accelerated reconstruction and T-2 mapping. A 2-parameter-weighted fitting method was compared with 2- or 3-parameter models for accurate T-2 estimation under the influences of noise and B-1 inhomogeneity. The performance was evaluated using both digital phantoms and healthy volunteers. Mitigating partial voluming with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) was also tested. Results: Simulations demonstrates that the 2-parameter-weighted fitting approach was robust to a large range of B-1 scales and SNR levels. With an in-plane acceleration factor of 5, the model-based compressed sensing-incorporated method yielded around 8% normalized errors compared to references. The T-2 estimation with and without CSF nulling was consistent with literature values. Conclusion: This work demonstrated the feasibility of a T-2 quantification technique with 3D high-resolution and whole-brain coverage in 2-3 min. The proposed iterative reconstruction method, which utilized the model consistency, data consistency and spatial sparsity jointly, provided reasonable T-2 estimation. The technique also allowed mitigation of CSF partial volume effect.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available