4.6 Article

Unraveling the contributions to the neuromelanin-MRI contrast

Journal

BRAIN STRUCTURE & FUNCTION
Volume 225, Issue 9, Pages 2757-2774

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00429-020-02153-z

Keywords

Neuromelanin; Neuromelanin-MRI; Locus coeruleus; Substantia nigra; Magnetization transfer

Funding

  1. NWO VENI [451-14-035]
  2. NIH-NIA [R01 AG062559]
  3. Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Sciences of Maastricht University
  4. Institute for Basic Science, Suwon, Republic of Korea [IBS-R015-D1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Locus Coeruleus (LC) and the Substantia Nigra (SN) are small brainstem nuclei that change with aging and may be involved in the development of various neurodegenerative and psychiatric diseases. Magnetization Transfer (MT) MRI has been shown to facilitate LC and the SN visualization, and the observed contrast is assumed to be related to neuromelanin accumulation. Imaging these nuclei may have predictive value for the progression of various diseases, but interpretation of previous studies is hindered by the fact that the precise biological source of the contrast remains unclear, though several hypotheses have been put forward. To inform clinical studies on the possible biological interpretation of the LC- and SN contrast, we examined an agar-based phantom containing samples of natural Sepia melanin and synthetic Cys-Dopa-Melanin and compared this to the in vivo human LC and SN. T-1 and T-2* maps, MT spectra and relaxation times of the phantom, the LC and the SN were measured, and a two-pool MT model was fitted. Additionally, Bloch simulations and a transient MT experiment were conducted to confirm the findings. Overall, our results indicate that Neuromelanin-MRI contrast in the LC likely results from a lower macromolecular fraction, thus facilitating interpretation of results in clinical populations. We further demonstrate that in older individuals T-1 lengthening occurs in the LC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available