4.8 Article

Human Innate Lymphoid Cell Subsets Possess Tissue-Type Based Heterogeneity in Phenotype and Frequency

Journal

IMMUNITY
Volume 46, Issue 1, Pages 148-161

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.11.005

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. A-STAR/SIgN core funding
  2. A-STAR/SIgN immunomonitoring platform funding
  3. Translational & Clinical Research grand from the National Medical Research Council, Singapore [NMRC/TCR/007-NCC/2013]
  4. National Cancer Center Singapore [CG/007/2013-SD2 (NCCSPG-YR2015-JUL-13)]
  5. NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford
  6. NIHR Senior Fellowship
  7. [WT109965MA]
  8. Lundbeck Foundation [R151-2013-14624] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0515-10005] Funding Source: researchfish
  10. Wellcome Trust [109965/Z/15/Z] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Animal models have highlighted the importance of innate lymphoid cells (ILCs) in multiple immune responses. However, technical limitations have hampered adequate characterization of ILCs in humans. Here, we used mass cytometry including a broad range of surface markers and transcription factors to accurately identify and profile ILCs across healthy and inflamed tissue types. High dimensional analysis allowed for clear phenotypic delineation of ILC2 and ILC3 subsets. We were not able to detect ILC1 cells in any of the tissues assessed, however, we identified intra-epithelial (ie) ILC1-like cells that represent a broader category of NK cells in mucosal and non-mucosal pathological tissues. In addition, we have revealed the expression of phenotypic molecules that have not been previously described for ILCs. Our analysis shows that human ILCs are highly heterogeneous cell types between individuals and tissues. It also provides a global, comprehensive, and detailed description of ILC heterogeneity in humans across patients and tissues.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available