4.6 Article

Isosymmetric phase transitions, ultrahigh ductility, and topological nodal lines in α-Ag2S

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
Volume 102, Issue 14, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.102.140101

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52032001, 51671126, 11674077]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2232019A3-13, 2232018D3-32]
  3. Shenzhen Peacock Plan [KQTD2016053019134356]
  4. Guangdong Innovative & Entrepreneurial Research Team Program [2016ZT06C279, 2017ZT07C062]
  5. Key Research Platforms and Projects of Universities in Guangdong Province [2018KZDXM062]
  6. Shenzhen Development and Reform Commission Foundation for Shenzhen Engineering Research Center for Frontier Materials Synthesis at High Pressure
  7. US NSF [DMR-1506669, DMREF-1626967]
  8. Research Platform for Crystal Growth & Thin-Film Preparation at SUSTech
  9. Shenzhen PengchengScholarship Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report two reversible pressure-induced isosymmetric phase transitions in a-Ag 2 S that are accompanied by two compressive anomalies at 7.5 and 16 GPa, respectively. The first transition arises from a sudden and drastic puckering of the wrinkled Ag-S layers, which leads to an anomalous structural softening at high pressure and gives rise to the ultrahigh compressive ductility in alpha-Ag2S. The second transition stems from a pressure-driven electronic state crossover from a conventional semiconductor to a topological metal. The band-crossing points near the Fermi energy form a nodal-line structure due to the preservation of the time-reversal and space-inversion symmetries under pressure. Our findings not only reveal the underlying mechanism responsible for the ultrahigh ductility in this class of inorganic semiconductors, but also provide a distinctive member to the growing family of topological metals and semimetals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available