4.5 Article

Optimal operation of hybrid microgrids for enhancing resiliency considering feasible islanding and survivability

Journal

IET RENEWABLE POWER GENERATION
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages 846-857

Publisher

INST ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY-IET
DOI: 10.1049/iet-rpg.2016.0820

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP)
  2. Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (MOTIE) of the Republic of Korea [20168530050030]
  3. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [20168530050030] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Microgrids have the capability to enhance the resiliency of power systems by supplying local loads during emergency situations. However, the disturbance incident and clearance times cannot be predicted precisely. Therefore, this study is focused on enhancing the resiliency of hybrid microgrids considering feasible islanding and survivability of critical loads. The optimisation problem is decomposed into normal and emergency operation problems. In normal operation, unit commitment status of dispatchable generators and schedules of batteries are revised to ensure a feasible islanding following a disturbance event. In emergency operation, the decision between charging of batteries for future dispatch and feeding of lesser critical loads is considered. In addition, a strategy for minimisation of load curtailment during switching of scheduling windows is also considered. These two considerations can mitigate the curtailment of critical loads during the emergency period. Finally, a resiliency index is formulated to evaluate the performance of the proposed strategy during emergency operation. Numerical simulations have demonstrated the effectiveness of the proposed strategy for enhancing the resiliency of hybrid microgrids.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available