4.6 Article

Enhanced electrocatalytic nitrogen reduction activity by incorporation of a carbon layer on SnS microflowers

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
Volume 8, Issue 39, Pages 20677-20686

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0ta06576e

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21908090]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province [20192ACB21015]
  3. Graduate Innovation Program of Nanchang University [CX2019111]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Earth-abundant elements are highly desirable electrocatalysts for artificial N2fixation (NRR). However, most earth-abundant elements are inactive for the NRR, and the competitive hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) causes inferior faradaic efficiency. Thus, facile modification methods to transform an NRR-unfavorable electrocatalyst into its NRR-favorable counterpart are highly demanded. Herein, we present an efficient hydrophobic carbon layer incorporation strategy on tin monosulfide (SnS@C) to greatly boost the NRR activity of SnS. The hydrophobic carbon layer can limit proton availability at the electrode surface while integrating the advantages of strong N2adsorption and better conductivity that synergistically improve the NRR performance. Specifically, SnS@C delivers a high faradaic efficiency of 14.56% and NH3yield of 7.95 x 10-11mol s-1cm-2(24.33 mu gNH3h-1mgcat-1) at -0.5 Vversusthe reversible hydrogen electrode. It also exhibits durable stability for consecutive electrolysis over 18 h. Adequate control and15N isotopic labeling experiments confirm the reliability of N sources. Density functional theory calculations reveal that the superior activity is attributed to the redistribution and bias of electrons between the SnS and carbon-layer interface. This work highlights that the simple hydrophobic carbon layer incorporation strategy could guide the design and modification of advanced NRR catalysts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available