4.7 Review

Neural signatures of prosocial behaviors

Journal

NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS
Volume 118, Issue -, Pages 186-195

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.07.006

Keywords

Prosocial behavior; Empathy; Mentalizing; Activation likelihood estimation; Meta-analytic connectivity mapping; Resting-state functional connectivity

Funding

  1. Max Planck Society
  2. National Institute of Mental Health [R01-MH074457]
  3. Helmholtz Portfolio Theme Supercomputing and Modeling for the Human Brain
  4. European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme [785907]
  5. NKI-RS project (NIMH BRAINS) [R01MH094639-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Prosocial behaviors are hypothesized to require socio-cognitive and empathic abilities-engaging brain regions attributed to the mentalizing and empathy brain networks. Here, we tested this hypothesis with a coordinate-based meta-analysis of 600 neuroimaging studies on prosociality, mentalizing and empathy (similar to 12,000 individuals). We showed that brain areas recruited by prosocial behaviors only partially overlap with the mentalizing (dorsal posterior cingulate cortex) and empathy networks (middle cingulate cortex). Additionally, the dorsolateral and ventromedial prefrontal cortices were preferentially activated by prosocial behaviors. Analyses on the functional connectivity profile and functional roles of the neural patterns underlying prosociality revealed that in addition to socio-cognitive and empathic processes, prosocial behaviors further involve evaluation processes and action planning, likely to select the action sequence that best satisfies another person's needs. By characterizing the multidimensional construct of prosociality at the neural level, we provide insights that may support a better understanding of normal and abnormal social cognition (e.g., psychopathy).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available