4.2 Article

In vitro and in vivo antifungal properties of silver nanoparticles against Rhizoctonia solani, a common agent of rice sheath blight disease

Journal

IET NANOBIOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages 236-240

Publisher

INST ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY-IET
DOI: 10.1049/iet-nbt.2015.0121

Keywords

antibacterial activity; silver; nanoparticles; nanomedicine; plant diseases; crops; in vitro antifungal properties; in vivo antifungal properties; silver nanoparticles; rice sheath blight disease; major crop losses; causal agent; Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn; sclerotia; harsh environmental conditions; disease management methods; hazardous chemicals; sustainable agriculture; negative impact; inhibition level; mycelia growth; in vivo glasshouse experiments; rice plants; suppressive effect; lesion development; leaves

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sheath blight disease in rice has caused major crop losses worldwide. Managing the causal agent of disease Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn is difficult because of its broad host range and formation of sclerotia which can survive in harsh environmental conditions; therefore developing innovative disease management methods without application of hazardous chemicals has been considered as the main concern to maintain sustainable agriculture. This presented research has revealed the negative impact of silver nanoparticles (SNPs) on R. solani and disease progress both in vitro and in vivo. The adverse effects of the SNPs on R. solaniare significantly dependent on the quantity of SNPs, sprayed at different concentrations in vitro. The highest inhibition level against sclerotia formation and mycelia growth are 92 and 85%, respectively, at a SNPs concentration of 50ppm. In vivo glasshouse experiments also showed that SNPs at the same concentration favourably affects both the fresh and dry weight of rice plants with a remarkable suppressive effect on the lesion development in leaves.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available