4.7 Article

Optimally sizing of battery energy storage capacity by operational optimization of residential PV-Battery systems: An Australian household case study

Journal

RENEWABLE ENERGY
Volume 160, Issue -, Pages 852-864

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2020.07.022

Keywords

Optimal battery capacity; Battery energy storage system; Operational optimization; Self-consumption maximization; Return on investment

Funding

  1. Australian government research training program scholarship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Residential battery energy storage system (BESS) adoption is hindered with its expensive price in current market. Optimally sized BESS can excel the fiscal benefits and thus can be economically sensible. An optimization problem, which targets to minimize the total annual cost including both energy and battery degradation-based costs, is formulated to investigate the added benefits of operational optimization of a BESS over the baseline operation of BESS based on self-consumption maximization (SCM). A case study is conducted considering a Victorian electricity customer in Australia. Results revealed that installation of residential BESSs are fiscally beneficial at current market prices only if adequate rebates are available. A fiscally beneficial upper limit of BESS capacity that can be installed with the prevailing government incentives depending on the PV system capacity is also found. For a given installed cost of BESS (AU$/kWh), optimal BESS capacity is larger when operational optimization of BESS is considered. However, with a time-of-use (TOU) tariff scheme, BESSs based on operational optimization outperforms BESSs based on SCM in terms of the minimum total annual cost, return on investment and PV curtailment avoidance which excels the fiscal benefits of a BESS and results in indirect greenhouse gas emission reduction. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available