4.7 Article

A broad overview comparing a fungal, thermal and acid pre-treatment of bean straw in terms of substrate and anaerobic digestion effect

Journal

BIOMASS & BIOENERGY
Volume 142, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2020.105775

Keywords

Anaerobic digestion; Bean straw; Biogas; Hydrolysate; Microbial community; Pre-treatment

Funding

  1. School of Civil Engineering at The University of Queensland
  2. [IPN20150837]
  3. [IPNBEIFI2124]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A comparison of lignocellulose degradation, energy requirements, biogas production and microbial community analysis was done between a fungal (Pleurotus ostreatus, 28 d, 35 degrees C), thermal (1 h, 121 degrees C) and acid (2% HCl, 2 h, 123 degrees C) pre-treatment of bean straw. The results revealed that the type of pre-treatment had a great impact on lignocellulose degradation and energy demand, where the acid pre-treatment had higher solubilization capacity (lignin 67%, hemicellulose 68% and 0.49 g sugars.g(-1) bean straw) and demanded less energy as compared with the fungal pre-treatment. Contrary, the type of pre-treatment did not have an apparent effect on the anaerobic digestion of the hydrolysates after 37 days of bioreactors operation in terms of biogas yield (142-165 mL.g(-1) chemical oxygen demand-COD), COD and sugars degradation (>80%). The bioreactor using acid pre-treatment hydrolysates showed differences in the total bacterial and archaea estimates, with a more pronounced increase in archaea (Euryarchaeota) and bacteria (Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, and Proteobacteria), suggesting a more favorable composition for microbial growth. Overall, the acid pre-treatment was the most effective on all the parameters compared in this study. Further studies should include other important parameters to consider when selecting a pre-treatment method including environmental and economic implications of solid phase disposal and pH adjustment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available