4.7 Review

How to decide and visualize whether uncertainty or variability is dominating in life cycle assessment results: A systematic review

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE
Volume 133, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2020.104841

Keywords

Methodology; Uncertainty; Variability; Life cycle assessment; Monte Carlo simulation; Sensitivity

Funding

  1. KU Leuven, Department of Biosystems (BIOSYST)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

LCA results are typically reported as deterministic, while reality is uncertain and variable. Through a systematic review, we studied which methodologies and associated visualizations have already been used to assess both uncertainty and variability, as separate concepts, in the same LCA study. We aim to select the most appropriate one(s) that allow to decide whether uncertainty or variability is dominating in the results. 562 studies were identified by combining four topics (uncertainty, variability, LCA and methodology) of which eleven were eligible. These studies used a multi-step approach, often combining Monte Carlo simulations with a local and/or global sensitivity analysis and statistical measures. Based on our review, we recommend Monte Carlo simulations visualized in uncertainty and variability ratios and global sensitivity analysis visualized using total sensitivity indices for future use in LCA. Ratios allow to clearly decide whether uncertainty or variability is dominating and sensitivity indices allow to identify essential parameters.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available