4.7 Article

Exploring the potential of common iceplant, seaside arrowgrass and sea fennel as edible halophytic plants

Journal

FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL
Volume 137, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109613

Keywords

Halophytic plants; Polyphenols; Mesembryanthemum crystallinum; Crithmum maritimum; Triglochin maritima; New food; Dietary fiber; Iron content

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness project [AGL2014-52825-R]
  2. European Union ERDF funds (European Regional Development Fund)
  3. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [BES-2015-074420]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The recent interest in diversification in food consumption and the current salinization and desertification processes of farmland have placed the focus on halophytic plants as new food, making necessary the characterization of their biochemical composition and the identification of possible bioactive compounds. In this work, three edible halophytic plants were characterized: common iceplant (Mesembryanthemum crystallinum), sea fennel (Crithmum maritimum), and seaside arrowgrass (Triglochin maritima). The plants studied were a good source of minerals. Sea fennel showed high contents of dietary fibre and calcium (8.5 ppm, wet weight), common iceplant had a high potassium content (6500 ppm, wet weight), while seaside arrowgrass presented high levels of iron (62 ppm, wet weight). The glucose content of the three species was below 30 mg/g per dried weight. The Sb, Pb, Cr, As, Cd, and Hg content was negligible. Polyunsaturated fatty acids, mainly alpha-linolenic and linoleic acid, prevailed in the three species analyzed. Hydroxycinnamic and hydroxybenzoic acids predominated in common iceplant and sea fennel. Glycosylated flavones, especially isoorientin, prevailed in seaside arrowgrass. These plants present a relevant nutritional profile for which their use as foods or ingredients should be promoted.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available