4.7 Review

Good or bad: Application of RAAS inhibitors in COVID-19 patients with cardiovascular comorbidities

Journal

PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS
Volume 215, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2020.107628

Keywords

Hypertension; RAAS inhibitors; COVID-19; Bradykinin; Inflammation

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [91839302, 81630010, 81790624]
  2. Tongji Hospital Clinical Research Flagship Program [2019CR207]
  3. Intramural Research Program of the NIH, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences [Z01 ES025034]
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES [ZIAES025034] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is caused by a newly emerged coronavirus (CoV) called Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). COVID-19 patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) comorbidities have significantly increased morbidity and mortality. The use of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor type 1 blockers (ARBs) improve CVD outcomes; however, there is concern that they may worsen the prognosis of CVD patients that become infected with SARS-CoV-2 because the virus uses the ACE2 receptor to bind to and subsequently infect host cells. Thus, some health care providers and media sources have questioned the continued use of ACE inhibitors and ARBs. In this brief review, we discuss the effect of ACE inhibitor-induced bradykinin on the cardiovascular system, on the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) regulation in COVID-19 patients, and analyze recent clinical studies regarding patients treated with RAAS inhibitors. We propose that the application of RAAS inhibitors for COVID-19 patients with CVDs may be beneficial rather than harmful. (C) 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available