4.8 Article

APOE4 exacerbates synapse loss and neurodegeneration in Alzheimer's disease patient iPSC-derived cerebral organoids

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-19264-0

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [RF1AG051504, R37AG027924, RF1AG046205, RF1AG057181, R01AG066395, P01NS074969, P30AG062677]
  2. Younkin Fellowship
  3. Alzheimer's Association Research Fellowship [2018-AARF-592302, R01AG061796]
  4. Mayo Clinic Center for Regenerative Medicine
  5. Haworth Family Professorship in Neurodegenerative Diseases fund
  6. Albertson Parkinson's Research Foundation
  7. Donald G. and Jodi P. Heeringa Family

Ask authors/readers for more resources

APOE4 is the strongest genetic risk factor associated with late-onset Alzheimer's disease (AD). To address the underlying mechanism, we develop cerebral organoid models using induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) with APOE epsilon 3/epsilon 3 or epsilon 4/epsilon 4 genotype from individuals with either normal cognition or AD dementia. Cerebral organoids from AD patients carrying APOE epsilon 4/epsilon 4 show greater apoptosis and decreased synaptic integrity. While AD patient-derived cerebral organoids have increased levels of A beta and phosphorylated tau compared to healthy subject-derived cerebral organoids, APOE4 exacerbates tau pathology in both healthy subject-derived and AD patient-derived organoids. Transcriptomics analysis by RNA-sequencing reveals that cerebral organoids from AD patients are associated with an enhancement of stress granules and disrupted RNA metabolism. Importantly, isogenic conversion of APOE4 to APOE3 attenuates the APOE4-related phenotypes in cerebral organoids from AD patients. Together, our study using human iPSC-organoids recapitulates APOE4-related phenotypes and suggests APOE4-related degenerative pathways contributing to AD pathogenesis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available