Journal
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION
Volume 178, Issue -, Pages 267-286Publisher
ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2020.07.005
Keywords
Gender; Redistribution; Overconfidence; Risk attitudes; Voting; Taxation
Categories
Funding
- Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) through a personal Veni grant
- NWO through a personal VIDI grant
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Gender differences in voting patterns and political attitudes towards redistribution are well-documented. The experimental gender literature suggests several plausible behavioral explanations behind these differences, relating to gender differences in confidence concerning future relative income position, risk aversion, and social preferences. We use data from lab experiments on preferences for redistribution conducted in the U.S. and several European countries to investigate gender differences and their causes. On aggregate, women's demand for redistribution is higher than men's, but the differences vary considerably across locations and countries. Moreover, the gender difference appears only when the source of inequality is based on relative abilities, but not when it is based on luck. Our most robust finding is that across all sampled locations, men' s relatively higher (over)confidence in their abilities, in comparison to women, leads them to specify lower redistribution levels. We discuss the role of confidence in accounting for gender differences in political and redistributive choices outside the lab. (c) 2020 Published by Elsevier B.V.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available