3.9 Article

Identification and differentiation of Campylobacter isolated from chicken meat using real-time polymerase chain reaction and high resolution melting analysis of hipO and glyA genes

Journal

VETERINARY WORLD
Volume 13, Issue 9, Pages 1875-1883

Publisher

VETERINARY WORLD
DOI: 10.14202/vetworld.2020.1875-1883

Keywords

Campylobacter coli; Campylobacter jejuni; chicken meat; glyA; hipO; melting curves

Funding

  1. Agency of Agricultural Counseling and Human Resource Development Ministry of Agriculture, Republic of Indonesia
  2. Quality Control Laboratory and Certification of Animal Products (QCLCAP/BPMSPH) Bogor of the Ministry of Agriculture, Republic of Indonesia [751/KPTS/Kp.320/10/2018]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and Aim: Campylobacter species have been recognized as the most frequently identified bacterial cause of human gastroenteritis. The aims of this study were to identify Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli species isolated from chicken meat and to analyze the differences in the melting curve patterns of both species. Materials and Methods: A total of 105 chicken meat samples collected from slaughterhouses and retailers in six provinces in Indonesia were examined for the isolation and identification of Campylobacter spp. A total of 56 positive isolates of Campylobacter spp. were analyzed using the quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction and high resolution melting method. Results: The prevalence of Campylobacter spp. in chicken meat was found to be 61.9%. Regarding the identification, 23 isolates (41.07%) were C. jejuni, 22 (39.29%) were C. coli, six (10.71%) were a mix between C. jejuni and C. coli, and five isolates (8.93%) were Campylobacter spp. All the C. jejuni and C. coli isolates produced varied melting curve patterns. Conclusion: The high prevalence of C. jejuni and C. coli in chicken meat in Indonesia indicates a high risk of the incidence of campylobacteriosis in humans.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available