4.5 Article

Polarization and public health: Partisan differences in social distancing during the coronavirus pandemic

Journal

JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS
Volume 191, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104254

Keywords

Coronavirus; Political polarization; Media trust; Health behaviors

Categories

Funding

  1. Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research (SIEPR)
  2. John S. and James L. Knight Foundation
  3. Sloan Foundation
  4. Institute for Humane Studies
  5. National Science Foundation [DGE-1656518]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We study partisan differences in Americans' response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Political leaders and media outlets on the right and left have sent divergent messages about the severity of the crisis, which could impact the extent to which Republicans and Democrats engage in social distancing and other efforts to reduce disease transmission. We develop a simple model of a pandemic response with heterogeneous agents that clarifies the causes and consequences of heterogeneous responses. We use location data froma large sample of smartphones to showthat areaswithmore Republicans engaged in less social distancing, controlling for other factors including public policies, population density, and local COVID cases and deaths. We then present new survey evidence of significant gaps at the individual level between Republicans and Democrats in self-reported social distancing, beliefs about personal COVID risk, and beliefs about the future severity of the pandemic. (c) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available