4.8 Article

Nr4a1 and Nr4a3 Reporter Mice Are Differentially Sensitive to T Cell Receptor Signal Strength and Duration

Journal

CELL REPORTS
Volume 33, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108328

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Wellcome Trust [214018/Z/18/Z]
  2. Arthur Thomson summer studentship
  3. BBSRC David Phillips Fellowship [BB/J013951/1]
  4. University of Birmingham
  5. University of Birmingham Fellowship
  6. BBSRC [BB/S003800/1]
  7. MRC Programme Grant [MR/N000919/1]
  8. BBSRC [BB/M025292/1, BB/S003800/1, BB/J013951/2, BB/J013951/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  9. MRC [MR/N000919/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  10. Wellcome Trust [214018/Z/18/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nr4a receptors are activated by T cell receptor (TCR) signaling and play key roles in T cell differentiation. Which TCR signaling pathways regulate Nr4a receptors and their sensitivities to TCR signal strength and duration remains unclear. Using Nr4a1/Nur77-GFP and Nr4a3-Timer of cell kinetics and activity (Tocky) mice, we elucidate the signaling pathways governing Nr4a receptor expression. We reveal that Nr4a1-Nr4a3 are Src family kinase dependent. Moreover, Nr4a2 and Nr4a3 are attenuated by calcineurin inhibitors and bind nuclear factor of activated T cells 1 (NFAT1), highlighting a necessary and sufficient role for NFAT1 in the control of Nr4a2 and Nr4a3, but redundancy for Nr4a1. Nr4a1-GFP is activated by tonic and cognate signals during T cell development, whereas Nr4a3-Tocky requires cognate peptide:major histocompatibility complex (MHC) interactions for expression. Compared to Nr4a3-Tocky, Nr4a1-GFP is approximately 2- to 3-fold more sensitive to TCR signaling and is detectable by shorter periods of TCR signaling. These findings suggest that TCR signal duration may be an underappreciated aspect influencing the developmental fate of T cells in vivo.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available