4.6 Article

Sea level, biotic and carbon-isotope response to the Paleocene-Eocene thermal maximum in Tibetan Himalayan platform carbonates

Journal

GLOBAL AND PLANETARY CHANGE
Volume 194, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2020.103316

Keywords

Carbon isotopes; Paleocene-Eocene thermal maximum; Relative sea-level changes; Biotic response; Shallow-water carbonate ramp; Southern Tibet

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41888101, 41702105]
  2. State Key Laboratory of Palaeobiology and Stratigraphy [183115]
  3. China Scholarship Council [201806195034]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

During the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum (PETM, similar to 56 Ma), a large, negative carbon-isotope excursion (CIE) testifies to a massive perturbation of the global carbon cycle. Shallow-marine settings are crucial to understand the environmental and ecological changes associated with the PETM and the connection between continental and open-marine environments. Detailed sedimentological, paleontological, and geochemical analysis of a quasi-continuous succession of shallow-marine carbonates in the Tethys Himalaya of southern Tibet indicates that a relative rise in sea level coincided with PETM onset, continued through PETM core, and terminated with a regression at PETM recovery. At PETM onset, corresponding to the SBZ4/SBZ5 boundary, no obvious impact on biota and specifically on larger benthic foraminifera (LBF) is observed. The major biotic change occurs later on at PETM recovery, corresponding to the SBZ5/SBZ6 boundary. Our data suggest that relative sea level, rather than temperature, exerted the main control on benthic biota during the PETM. Although the delta C-13(org) values of organic matter are similar in the deep sea and shallow-marine continental margins, the delta C-13(carb) value of bulk carbonates are significantly C-13-depleted, which we attribute to environmental change driven by relative sea-level fluctuations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available