4.6 Review

APOE2: protective mechanism and therapeutic implications for Alzheimer's disease

Journal

MOLECULAR NEURODEGENERATION
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13024-020-00413-4

Keywords

Apolipoprotein E2; Alzheimer’ s disease; Amyloid-β Cerebrovascular disease; Lipid metabolism; Longevity; Neuroinflammation; Neurofibrially tangles; TDP-43; α -Synuclein

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health
  2. Coins for Alzheimer's Research Trust (CART) Foundation
  3. National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology
  4. Hori Sciences and Arts Foundation
  5. Yokoyama Foundation for Clinical Pharmacology
  6. Cure Alzheimer's Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Investigations of apolipoprotein E (APOE) gene, the major genetic risk modifier for Alzheimer's disease (AD), have yielded significant insights into the pathogenic mechanism. Among the three common coding variants, APOE*epsilon 4 increases, whereas APOE*epsilon 2 decreases the risk of late-onset AD compared with APOE*epsilon 3. Despite increased understanding of the detrimental effect of APOE*epsilon 4, it remains unclear how APOE*epsilon 2 confers protection against AD. Accumulating evidence suggests that APOE*epsilon 2 protects against AD through both amyloid-beta (A beta)-dependent and independent mechanisms. In addition, APOE*epsilon 2 has been identified as a longevity gene, suggesting a systemic effect of APOE*epsilon 2 on the aging process. However, APOE*epsilon 2 is not entirely benign; APOE*epsilon 2 carriers exhibit increased risk of certain cerebrovascular diseases and neurological disorders. Here, we review evidence from both human and animal studies demonstrating the protective effect of APOE*epsilon 2 against AD and propose a working model depicting potential underlying mechanisms. Finally, we discuss potential therapeutic strategies designed to leverage the protective effect of APOE2 to treat AD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available