4.2 Article

Functional Connectivity Hubs Could Serve as a Potential Biomarker in Alzheimer's Disease: A Reproducible Study

Journal

CURRENT ALZHEIMER RESEARCH
Volume 12, Issue 10, Pages 974-983

Publisher

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.2174/1567205012666150710111615

Keywords

Alzheimer's disease; biomarker; classification; functional connectivity density; mild cognitive impairment; resting state functional MRI

Funding

  1. National Key Basic Research, Development Program of China (973 program) [2011CB707800]
  2. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB020-30300]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of China [91132301, 61305143, 60831004]
  4. One Hundred Talents Plan of Chinese Academy of Science

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cortical hubs that link functionally specialized neural systems are crucial for cognition. Evidence suggests that the location and organization of hubs are related to Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, two issues remain unclear: (i) where and how hubs change in AD, and (ii) whether hubs could be a potential pre-diagnosis biomarker for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) - a prodromal phase of AD. Accordingly, we examined the functional connectivity density (FCD) in two cohorts of resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scans (26 AD, 27 controls; 33 AD, 21 controls) and revealed consistently vulnerable FCD hub regions in AD compared with controls: within the default mode network, short-range FCD decreases in the posterior cingulate cortex and increases in the medial prefrontal cortex; within the frontal lobe, long-range FCD increases in the medial prefrontal cortex, superior frontal gyrus and middle frontal gyrus. Furthermore, FCD correlates with cognitive score and could distinguish MCI from controls with high accuracy (71.08% in dataset 1, 81% in dataset 2). By reflecting a robust and reproducible global shift in brain functions, FCD provides an fMRI biomarker for the underlying mechanism in AD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available