4.6 Article

GW190521: Orbital Eccentricity and Signatures of Dynamical Formation in a Binary Black Hole Merger Signal

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
Volume 903, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/abbe26

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council (ARC) [FT150100281, FT160100112]
  2. Centre of Excellence [CE170100004]
  3. Direct Grant of the CUHK Research Committee [4053406]
  4. Astronomy National Collaborative Research Infrastructure Strategy (NCRIS)
  5. National Science Foundation [PHY-0757058, PHY-0823459]
  6. National Science Foundation
  7. French Centre National de Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
  8. Italian Istituto Nazionale della Fisica Nucleare (INFN)
  9. Dutch Nikhef
  10. [DP180103155]
  11. [PHY-1764464]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pair-instability supernovae are thought to restrict the formation of black holes in the mass range similar to 50-135 M-circle dot. However, black holes with masses within this high mass gap are expected to form as the remnants of binary black hole mergers. These remnants can merge again dynamically in densely populated environments such as globular clusters. The hypothesis that the binary black hole merger GW190521 formed dynamically is supported by its high mass. Orbital eccentricity can also be a signature of dynamical formation, since a binary that merges quickly after becoming bound may not circularize before merger. In this work, we measure the orbital eccentricity of GW190521. We find that the data prefer a signal with eccentricity e >= 0.1 at 10 Hz to a nonprecessing, quasi-circular signal, with a log Bayes factor B = 5.0. When compared to precessing, quasi-circular analyses, the data prefer a nonprecessing, e >= 0.1 signal, with log Bayes factors ln B approximate to 2. Using injection studies, we find that a nonspinning, moderately eccentric (e = 0.13) GW190521-like binary can be mistaken for a quasi-circular, precessing binary. Conversely, a quasi-circular binary with spin-induced precession may be mistaken for an eccentric binary. We therefore cannot confidently determine whether GW190521 was precessing or eccentric. Nevertheless, since both of these properties support the dynamical formation hypothesis, our findings support the hypothesis that GW190521 formed dynamically.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available