4.6 Article

Scanning Micro X-ray Fluorescence (μXRF) as an Effective Tool in Quantifying Fe Dissolution in LiFePO4Cells: Towards a Mechanistic Understanding of Fe Dissolution

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 167, Issue 13, Pages -

Publisher

ELECTROCHEMICAL SOC INC
DOI: 10.1149/1945-7111/abba62

Keywords

Batteries; Lithium; Lithium iron phosphate; scanning x-ray microfluorescence; transition metal dissolution; electrolyte additives; cell failure

Funding

  1. NSERC/Tesla Canada IRC program
  2. NSERC
  3. Killam Foundation
  4. Nova Scotia Graduate Scholarship program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lithium iron phosphate (LiFePO4, or LFP) is a widely used cathode material in Li-ion cells due to its improved safety and low cost relative to other materials such as LiNixMnyCozO2(x + y + z = 1, NMC). To improve the calendar life of LFP cells, an investigation of their failure mechanisms is necessary. Herein, we use scanning micro X-ray fluorescence (mu XRF) to study Fe dissolution from LFP and deposition on the graphite electrode, which is thought to be a contributor to capacity fade. The impacts of the vinylene carbonate (VC) electrolyte additive, cycling conditions, and water content in the positive electrode on Fe dissolution were studied. There was no significant correlation between Fe dissolution and capacity fade found. Furthermore, we proposed that gas generation concomitant with Fe dissolution might be due to the reduction of the organic species coordinating Fe(2+)when they reach the negative electrode. Localized regions of increased Fe loading on the anode surface were found, which corresponded to regions with slight non-uniformities in stack pressure or current density. This work demonstrates the effectiveness of mu XRF in quantifying transition metal (TM) dissolution in Li-ion cells without any sample treatments that might mask valuable information such as element spatial distribution.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available