4.8 Article

Co-administered antibody improves penetration of antibody-dye conjugate into human cancers with implications for antibody-drug conjugates

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-19498-y

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [R01 CA190306-01]
  2. Stanford Molecular Imaging Scholars (SMIS) program [NIH T32CA118681]
  3. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research [019.171LW.022]
  4. Stanford University School of Medicine

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Poor tissue penetration remains a major challenge for antibody-based therapeutics of solid tumors, but proper dosing can improve the tissue penetration and thus therapeutic efficacy of these biologics. Due to dose-limiting toxicity of the small molecule payload, antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are administered at a much lower dose than their parent antibodies, which further reduces tissue penetration. We conducted an early-phase clinical trial (NCT02415881) and previously reported the safety of an antibody-dye conjugate (panitumumab-IRDye800CW) as primary outcome. Here, we report a retrospective exploratory analysis of the trial to evaluate whether co-administration of an unconjugated antibody could improve the intratumoral distribution of the antibody-dye conjugate in patients. By measuring the multiscale distribution of the antibody-dye conjugate, this study demonstrates improved microscopic antibody distribution without increasing uptake (toxicity) in healthy tissue when co-administered with the parent antibody, supporting further clinical investigation of the co-administration dosing strategy to improve the tumor penetration of ADCs. Antibody-drug conjugates targeting high expression receptors can suffer from poor tumour penetration. Here, the authors use unconjugated antibody to improve the penetration of an antibody-dye conjugate in a clinical study, supporting further clinical investigation of the co-administration strategy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available